So What Can We Do?

Also, if they allow objects to slip out of your hands, they aren’t ideal. Consider getting gloves with added grip features on the palm and beneath the fingernails. Ease of movement: Good tactical gloves should allow for easy movement of your fingers. Other than the standard protective mechanism, they should have a high level of dexterity.

Some experts recommend that to test for dexterity and ease of movement, try tying or untying your shoelaces. Comfort: Don’t get tactical gloves that trade your comfort for protection. Go for gloves made of breathable material to reduce sweat build-up when working. Also, ensure that the gloves you get are a perfect size for your hands: small, medium, large, or extra-large.

Price: It is advisable to consider the cost of the gloves. Go for gloves that fit your budget. Hands are an essential part of your body; hence you should do everything you can to protect them from injuries. When engaging in heavy-duty activities such as shooting, hiking, climbing, and motorcycling, consider getting an ideal pair of tactical gloves.

Go for the best tactical gloves in the market and enjoy unmatched hand safety and protection. Knowing how to clean a gun is about more than just having an attractive looking firearm. It’s about safety. Not following protocol when cleaning your weapon can lead to accidental injuries – or worse.

Besides the risks of physical injuries, there are legal implications as the firearm owner is liable for any injuries or damages that may result from a negligent discharge. Keep reading to learn how to clean a gun the right way and tips for doing so.

Good Preparation is KeyBefore you start cleaning your gun, you need to choose a clean area with plenty of space to work. 50!For less than three bucks more, I could have a scope with half again as much power, which presumably would make any target I shot at appear bigger and easier to hit and extend the effective range of my rifle.

Wow!So I bought the 6X scope, and in doing so innocently committed what I’ve come to call the “Three Sins of Rimfire Scopes. ”THE . 22 DILEMMAThe most grievous of these sins is thinking that lowly rimfires don’t deserve much in the way of scopes, because we’re not going to shoot anything important with our little “twennytews” anyhow.

Shooters who are serious about their rimfires, however, are increasingly ignoring this paradigm and thinking in terms of centerfire scopes. This has long been true of rimfire benchrest and target shooters who use the same scopes as their centerfire counterparts, but shooters whose ambitions range more toward punching holes in beer cans are discovering that some scopes made for centerfire rifles not only look and work beautifully on their rimfires but also eliminate optical problems such as close-range focus and magnification limitations.

Scopes with an adjustable objective (AO) lens can be sharply focused at close, rimfire distances, and when this feature is combined with a variable-X scope you have the best of all worlds. SizeThis should be pretty obvious. Handgun safes are going to be smaller than other safes, because your handguns shouldn’t be too big.

At the same time, the best handgun safes shouldn’t be too small either. FAQs about Handgun SafesWhat about biometric handgun safes? You might be asking: wait, what’s the best biometric handgun safe? Our response is: if protecting against a home invasion is important for you, don’t get a biometric handgun safe!

Why?Well, one of the most common complaints about gun safes sounds like this:“I got this biometric safe and I had to swipe my fingerprint a couple times before it registered! How annoying!”here’s a time and a place for biometric safes. They might be good for documents and other valuables.

However, that might be good enough for situations you need 100% reliability, not 99%. Situations…

However, handguns are different. Chance are that you want to keep your handgun BOTH secure AND reliably accessible… Biometric locks will workmost of the time. However, that might be good enough for situations you need 100% reliability, not 99%. Situations… Occasionally, biometric locks can suffer momentary failures.

Would I Trust My Life To This Weapon?

In some pilot installations, the photos on the face of non-electronic identity cards or passports are scanned and compared to the live scan of the passenger’s face for a match. At the same time, attributes of the document itself are examined to verify that they are valid, that they have not expired, and that the name on the card matches the name on the boarding pass.

Despite problems with image quality on many of these documents, this type of solution will be required for quite some time until all government-issued identity documents are able to store biometric templates. And, photo matching to a live person’s face is exactly what is being done when the airline or TSA agent inspects a document and then looks at the person.

20% more accurate than those agents in trials. A variation of this identity verification approach is being used at many airports for customs and border control. The facial biometric template stored on the person’s electronic passport is compared against their live face to confirm their identity.

This approach can considerably reduce border crossing delays, allowing agents to concentrate their time on passengers who need manual processing, allowing the others to quickly proceed through the gate. 3. Biometrics for Law Enforcement and Criminal InvestigationsIn the case of known criminals or terrorists, biometric matching uses a particular biometric known to belong to the individuals, and that is compared to biometric images collected from crime scenes.

This can include fingerprints on a murder weapon, or a security camera image of someone breaking into a gas station. This process is like the old “Mug-Shot” books police used to refer to, only much faster. Based on experience, there is a figure used by police forces claiming that up to 80% of crimes are committed by repeat offenders.

So it makes sense to compare crime scene biometrics to the collected biometrics of known felons from the last time they were caught. International and domestic terrorists are more of a challenge because there is often no stored database of the suspect’s fingerprints or facial images.

Poor quality, grainy images that may be several years old, yield very low probability biometric match results, but the systems are getting much better. In either case, the investigator needs the actual original fingerprint or facial image to work from as a starting point. This is where the news media usually gets it wrong.

Actual fingerprints recovered from a crime scene are matched against the various fingerprint databases, such as IAFIS (Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System), that are available to police and security forces. Biometric templates used for access control cannot be used for this. Facial Recognition and Video CamerasAlternatively, a picture of a known terror suspect can be matched against stored pictures, or even video clips, of crowds of people arriving at an airport or other transportation hubs to make sure that the individual in question is not coming into the country.

The need for these cameras in public spaces is absolute, and the fact that one of these cameras will also see many innocent people is inevitable. What government agencies do with those captured images of innocent people is really the question that needs to be asked with respect to privacy.

If they only keep them long enough to process the image matches, say a few days, before they irretrievably discard them, that is generally acceptable. However, if they permanently store all captured images of all persons walking through a specific area, people tend to get nervous.

The Boston Bombers were eventually identified using stored videos of the crowds. Is it good that they were identified and brought to justice? Yes. Is it appropriate that all of those stored images of mostly innocent people were accessible and used? That is the real subject of the privacy debate, and well beyond the scope of this blog post.